đŸȘŽ Anil's Garden

glibc - Wikipedia

19 Apr 202513 min read

The GNU C Library, commonly known as glibc, is the GNU Project implementation of the C standard library. It provides a wrapper around the system calls of the Linux kernel and other kernels for application use. Despite its name, it now also directly supports C++ (and, indirectly, other programming languages). It was started in the 1980s by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) for the GNU operating system.

glibc is free software released under the GNU Lesser General Public License.1 The GNU C Library project provides the core libraries for the GNU system, as well as many systems that use Linux as the kernel. These libraries provide critical APIs including ISO C11, POSIX.1-2008, BSD, OS-specific APIs and more. These APIs include such foundational facilities as open, read, write, malloc, printf, getaddrinfo, dlopen, pthread_create, crypt, login, exit and more.

History

VersionDateHighlights

Ulrich Drepper in 2007, the main author of glibc

The GNU C Library is a wrapper around the system calls of the Linux kernel.

The Linux kernel and GNU C Library together form the Linux API. After compilation, the binaries offer an ABI.

The glibc project was initially written mostly by Roland McGrath, working for the Free Software Foundation (FSF) in the summer of 1987 as a teenager.2 In February 1988, FSF described glibc as having nearly completed the functionality required by ANSI C.3 By 1992, it had the ANSI C-1989 and POSIX.1-1990 functions implemented and work was under way on POSIX.2.4 In September 1995 Ulrich Drepper made his first contribution to the glibc and by 1997 most commits were made by him. Drepper held the maintainership position for many years and until 2012 accumulated 63% of all commits to the project.5

In May 2009 glibc was migrated to a Git repository.5

In 2010, a licensing issue was resolved which was caused by the Sun RPC implementation in glibc that was not GPL compatible. It was fixed by re-licensing the Sun RPC components under the BSD license.6 7

In 2014, glibc suffered from an ABI breakage bug on s390.8

In July 2017, 30 years after he started glibc, Roland McGrath announced his departure, “declaring myself maintainer emeritus and withdrawing from direct involvement in the project. These past several months, if not the last few years, have proven that you don’t need me anymore”.2

In 2018, maintainer Raymond Nicholson removed a joke about abortion from the glibc source code. It was restored later by Alexandre Oliva after Richard Stallman demanded to have it returned.9

In 2021, the copyright assignment requirement to the Free Software Foundation was removed from the project.10

In 1994, the developers of the Linux kernel forked glibc. Their fork, “Linux libc”, was maintained separately until around 1998. Because the copyright attribution was insufficient, changes could not be merged back to the GNU Libc.11 When the FSF released glibc 2.0 in January 1997, the kernel developers discontinued Linux libc due to glibc 2.0’s superior compliance with POSIX standards.12 glibc 2.0 also had better internationalisation and more in-depth translation, IPv6 capability, 64-bit data access, facilities for multithreaded applications, future version compatibility, and the code was more portable.13 The last-used version of Linux libc used the internal name (soname) libc.so.5. Following on from this, glibc 2.x on Linux uses the soname libc.so.6 14

In 2009, Debian and a number of derivatives switched from glibc to the variant 15 eglibc.16 Eglibc was supported by a consortium consisting of Freescale, MIPS, MontaVista and Wind River.17 It contained changes that made it more suitable for embedded usage and had added support for architectures that were not supported by glibc, such as the PowerPC e500. The code of eglibc was merged back into glibc at version 2.20.18 Since 2014, eglibc is discontinued. The Yocto Project and Debian also moved back to glibc since the release of Debian Jessie.19

Steering committee

Starting in 2001 the library’s development had been overseen by a committee,20 with Ulrich Drepper 21 kept as the lead contributor and maintainer. The steering committee installation was surrounded by a public controversy, as it was openly described by Ulrich Drepper as a failed hostile takeover maneuver by Richard Stallman.22 23 24 25

In March 2012, the steering committee voted to disband itself and remove Drepper in favor of a community-driven development process, with Ryan Arnold, Maxim Kuvyrkov, Joseph Myers, Carlos O’Donell, and Alexandre Oliva holding the responsibility of GNU maintainership (but no extra decision-making power).26 27 28

Functionality

glibc provides the functionality required by the Single UNIX Specification, POSIX (1c, 1d, and 1j) and some of the functionality required by ISO C11, ISO C99, Berkeley Unix (BSD) interfaces, the System V Interface Definition (SVID) and the X/Open Portability Guide (XPG), Issue 4.2, with all extensions common to XSI (X/Open System Interface) compliant systems along with all X/Open UNIX extensions.

In addition, glibc also provides extensions that have been deemed useful or necessary while developing GNU.

glibc is used in systems that run many different kernels and different hardware architectures. Its most common use is in systems using the Linux kernel on x86 hardware, however, officially supported hardware 29 includes: ARM, ARC, C-SKY, DEC Alpha, IA-64, Motorola m68k, MicroBlaze, MIPS, Nios II, PA-RISC, PowerPC, RISC-V, s390, SPARC, and x86 (old versions support TILE). It officially supports the Hurd and Linux kernels. Additionally, there are heavily patched versions that run on the kernels of FreeBSD and NetBSD (from which Debian GNU/kFreeBSD and Debian GNU/NetBSD systems are built, respectively), as well as a forked-version of OpenSolaris.30 It is also used (in an edited form) and named libroot.so in BeOS and Haiku.31

glibc has been criticized as being ” bloated ” and slower than other libraries in the past, e.g. by Linus Torvalds 32 and embedded Linux programmers. For this reason, several alternative C standard libraries have been created which emphasize a smaller footprint. However, many small-device projects use GNU libc over the smaller alternatives because of its application support, standards compliance, and completeness. Examples include Openmoko 33 and Familiar Linux for iPaq handhelds (when using the GPE display software).34

glibc does not implement bounds-checking interfaces defined in C11 and did not implement strlcpy and strlcat 35 36 until 2023 on the grounds that “in practice these functions can cause trouble, as their intended use encourages silent data truncation, adds complexity and inefficiency, and does not prevent all buffer overruns in the destinations.” 37 The FAQ pointed out that the bounds-checking interfaces were optional in the ISO standard and that snprintf was available as an alternative.37

Compatibility layers

There are compatibility layers (” shims ”) to allow programs written for other ecosystems to run on glibc interface offering systems. These include libhybris, a compatibility layer for Android’s Bionic, and Wine, which can be seen as a compatibility layer from Windows APIs to glibc and other native APIs available on Unix-like systems.

See also

Notes

References

Footnotes

  1. “sourceware.org Git – glibc.git/blob – Makefile”. sourceware.org. Archived from the original on 10 June 2021. Retrieved 10 June 2021. LGPL-2.1-or-later in the headers ↩

  2. “Roland McGrath bows out as glibc maintainer [LWN.net]”. lwn.net. 7 July 2017. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 8 July 2017. ↩ ↩2

  3. “GNU’s Bulletin, vol. 1 no. 4, February, 1988”. Archived from the original on 16 April 2016. Retrieved 16 April 2014. Most libraries are done. Roland McGrath [
] has a nearly complete set of ANSI C library functions. We hope they will be ready some time this spring. ↩

  4. “GNU’s Bulletin, vol. 1 no. 12”. Archived from the original on 11 March 2016. Retrieved 16 April 2014. It now contains all of the ANSI C-1989 and POSIX.1-1990 functions, and work is in progress on POSIX.2 and Unix functions (BSD and System V) ↩

  5. Corbet, Jonathan (28 March 2012). “A turning point for GNU libc”. LWN.net. Archived from the original on 23 April 2016. Retrieved 5 April 2012. Of the nearly 19,000 commits found in the project’s git repository (which contains changes back to 1995), over 12,000 were made by Ulrich. ↩ ↩2

  6. “Glibc finally free software – The H Open: News and Features”. H-online. Archived from the original on 21 March 2022. Retrieved 19 September 2021. ↩

  7. Phipps, Simon (2 September 2010). “Gnu/Linux: Finally, it’s really free software”. InfoWorld. Archived from the original on 28 October 2021. Retrieved 19 September 2021. ↩

  8. Corbet, Jonathan. “The glibc s390 ABI break [LWN.net]“. LWN.net. Archived from the original on 17 March 2022. Retrieved 17 March 2022. ↩

  9. Claburn, Thomas. “Glibc ‘abortion joke’ diff tiff leaves Richard Stallman miffed”. The Register. Archived from the original on 17 January 2023. Retrieved 17 January 2023. ↩

  10. Halfacree, Gareth. “Open-source projects glibc and gnulib look to sever copyright ties with Free Software Foundation”. The Register. Archived from the original on 17 January 2023. Retrieved 17 January 2023. ↩

  11. “History of glibc and Linux libc”. Free Software Magazine. Archived from the original on 26 September 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021. ↩

  12. “Forking: it could even happen to you”. 24 October 2000. Archived from the original on 15 September 2009. the split between GNU LIBC and the Linux LIBC — it went on for years while Linux stabilized, and then the forks re-merged into one project ↩

  13. Lee, Elliot (9 July 1998). “A Technical Comparison of glibc 2.x With Legacy System Libraries”. Archived from the original on 11 April 2004. ↩

  14. Moen, Rick (20 May 2021) [14 Nov 1999]. “Fear of Forking essay”. linuxmafia.com. 6. glibc ⇒ Linux libc ⇒ glibc. Archived from the original on 27 November 2023. ↩

  15. 38 ↩

  16. Vaduva, Alexandru (2016). Linux: embedded development: leverage the power of Linux to develop captivating and powerful embedded Linux projects: a course in three modules. Alex Gonzalez, Chris Simmonds. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing. p. 24. ISBN 978-1-78712-445-5. OCLC 960471438. ↩

  17. Stiebert, Julius (6 May 2009). “Debian wechselt zur Eglibc”. golem.de. Archived from the original on 16 September 2021. Retrieved 16 September 2021. ↩

  18. Simmonds, Chris (2017). Mastering embedded Linux programming: unleash the full potential of embedded Linux (2nd ed.). Birmingham, UK. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-78728-885-0. OCLC 995052708.{{[cite book](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book "Template:Cite book")}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) ↩

  19. Vaduva, Alexandru (2015). Learning embedded Linux using the Yocto project: develop powerful embedded Linux systems with the Yocto project components. Birmingham, UK. p. 29. ISBN 978-1-78439-519-3. OCLC 914797028.{{[cite book](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_book "Template:Cite book")}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) ↩

  20. “glibc homepage”. Archived from the original on 22 April 2016. Retrieved 16 April 2014. In 2001 The GNU C Library Steering Committee
, was formed and currently consists of Mark Brown, Paul Eggert, Andreas Jaeger, Jakub Jelinek, Roland McGrath and Andreas Schwab. ↩

  21. “Ulrich Drepper”. LinkedIn. Archived from the original on 10 September 2014. Retrieved 13 June 2012. ↩

  22. online, heise (19 August 2001). “Open-Source-Entwickler kritisiert Stallman”. heise online (in German). Archived from the original on 16 September 2021. Retrieved 16 September 2021. ↩

  23. Drepper, Ulrich (26 June 2000). “RMS is at it again”. sourceware.org. Archived from the original on 28 December 2012. Retrieved 20 November 2015. A few weeks ago RMS started the next attack on me (a single mail, followed by indirect tries to take influence, followed by another mail today). The essence is that he complains I am not following “GNU policies” and therefore have to be replaced by a steering committee of which I could be a part. Some of you (namely Roland and Andreas S.) probably know about this since he proposed both as other members of the committee. In addition there was Mark Brown listed (I know somebody of this name at IBM who would also fit in this group but I’m not sure whether it is really him.) Anyhow, I completely reject this. It is not helping at all, the opposite is true. First, I am not aware of any essential policies I’m violating. The only ones are that I’m not following orders from RMS which clearly have political intends (which is of course a sacrilege) and possibly that I do not care about Winblowz (if the latter counts at all). None of this will change in any way. ↩

  24. Drepper, Ulrich (15 August 2001). “glibc 2.2.4”. sourceware.com. Archived from the original on 9 April 2016. Retrieved 29 November 2015. And now for some not so nice things. Stallman recently tried what I would call a hostile takeover of the glibc development. He tried to conspire behind my back and persuade the other main developers to take control so that in the end he is in control and can dictate whatever pleases him. This attempt failed but he kept on pressuring people everywhere and it got really ugly. In the end I agreed to the creation of a so-called “steering committee” (SC). ↩

  25. rms-accused-of-attempting-glibc-hostile-takeover Archived 1 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine on slashdot.com on 19 August 2001 ↩

  26. “The GNU C Library Steering Committee disbands – The H Open: News and Features”. H-Online. Archived from the original on 21 March 2023. Retrieved 16 March 2023. ↩

  27. McGrath, Roland (26 March 2012). “glibc steering committee dissolving”. Sourceware.org. Archived from the original on 26 September 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2012. ↩

  28. Myers, Joseph S. (26 March 2012). “GNU C Library development and maintainers”. Sourceware.org. Archived from the original on 26 September 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2012. ↩

  29. “The GNU C Library machine maintainers”. Archived from the original on 18 April 2016. Retrieved 8 October 2015. ↩

  30. Bartley, David; Spang, Michael. “GNU/kOpenSolaris (GNU libc/base + OpenSolaris kernel)“. Archived from the original on 6 November 2019. Retrieved 16 December 2008. ↩

  31. “Haiku Source”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 1 May 2016. Retrieved 15 October 2014. libroot.so is not part of GNU project and is included in Haiku source code. ↩

  32. Torvalds, Linus (9 January 2002). “Posting to the glibc mailing list”. Archived from the original on 12 October 2015. Retrieved 22 July 2007. ↩

  33. “OpenMoko components”. Archived from the original on 22 April 2016. Retrieved 13 May 2008. We will use glibc (not uClibC)
 The alternatives may save more space and be more optimized, but are more likely to give us integration headaches ↩

  34. “Re: [Familiar] Which glibc for Familiar 0.8.4?“. Archived from the original on 12 March 2022. Retrieved 26 November 2018. Question: which version of the GLIBC was used to build the Familiar 0.8.4? Answer: 2.3.3 ↩

  35. Kerrisk, Michael. “The ups and downs of strlcpy()“. LWN.net. Archived from the original on 9 December 2023. Retrieved 9 December 2023. ↩

  36. Corbet, Jonathan. “Adding strlcpy() to glibc”. LWN.net. Archived from the original on 9 December 2023. Retrieved 9 December 2023. ↩

  37. “FAQ”. sourceware.org. Archived from the original on 9 December 2023. Retrieved 9 December 2023. ↩ ↩2

  38. “EGLIBC: FAQ”. eglibc.org. Archived from the original on 17 March 2012. Retrieved 16 September 2021. ↩

Graph View

Backlinks